ActivityWatch
Automatically track how you spend time on your devices.
Two self-hosted Time Tracking apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
| ActivityWatch | solidtime | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Automatically track how you spend time on your devices. | Modern time tracking application for freelancers and agencies. |
| GitHub stars | 19,574 | 9,124 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 192 | 479 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-09 | 2026-11-09 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 (2026-10-10) | v0.22.1 (2026-10-21) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Python | Docker |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
Summary: ActivityWatch leads on GitHub popularity; solidtime leads on commit activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-15. It does not rate features or quality.
ActivityWatch has more GitHub stars (19,574 vs 9,124 for solidtime, as of 2026-11-15). Stars measure interest, not quality.
solidtime had more commits over the last 12 months (479 vs 192). Both had repository activity on 2026-11-09. Our health labels: ActivityWatch is “Active”, solidtime is “Active”.
ActivityWatch: MPL-2.0. solidtime: AGPL-3.0.
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for solidtime. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Automatically track how you spend time on your devices.
Modern time tracking application for freelancers and agencies.
Browse all self-hosted Time Tracking apps.