ArchiveBox
Create HTML & screenshot archives of sites from your bookmarks, browsing history, RSS feeds, or other sources (alternative to Wayback Machine).
ArchiveBox vs Wallabag
Two self-hosted Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| ArchiveBox | Wallabag | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Create HTML & screenshot archives of sites from your bookmarks, browsing history, RSS feeds, or other sources (alternative to Wayback Machine). | Web application, formerly Poche, allowing you to save articles to read them later with improved readability. |
| GitHub stars | 29,029 | 13,056 |
| Forks | 1.6k | – |
| Open issues (incl. PRs) | 154 | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 4.7k | 951 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-08 | 2026-11-09 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 (2026-10-27) | 2.6.15 (2026-10-28) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language / platform | Python, Docker | PHP |
| Docker Hub image | archivebox/archivebox | – |
| Docker pulls | 14372.8k | – |
| Est. server size | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $10/mo | $10/mo |
| Categories | Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) | Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- ArchiveBox is more popular on GitHub: 29k stars vs 13.1k for Wallabag.
- ArchiveBox had more commits in the last 12 months (4,717 vs 951).
- Wallabag published a release more recently (2.6.15 on 2026-10-28; ArchiveBox's latest is v0.9.77 on 2026-10-27).
- Both are licensed under MIT.
- ArchiveBox is written in Python; Wallabag in PHP.
- Deployment options listed upstream: ArchiveBox: Docker; Wallabag: none listed.
- Only ArchiveBox has a Docker Hub image that we detected (archivebox/archivebox).
Summary: ArchiveBox leads on GitHub popularity, commit activity and Docker Hub availability. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-15. It does not rate features or quality.
Get the Docker images
ArchiveBox
docker pull archivebox/archiveboxImage on Docker Hub. Ports, volumes and environment variables differ per app; follow the official docs.
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or Wallabag more popular?
ArchiveBox has more GitHub stars (29,029 vs 13,056 for Wallabag, as of 2026-11-15). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, ArchiveBox or Wallabag?
ArchiveBox had more commits over the last 12 months (4,717 vs 951). The last recorded activity was 2026-11-08 for ArchiveBox and 2026-11-09 for Wallabag. Our health labels: ArchiveBox is “Active”, Wallabag is “Active”.
What licenses do ArchiveBox and Wallabag use?
Both use MIT.
Can I run ArchiveBox and Wallabag with Docker?
ArchiveBox has a Docker Hub image (archivebox/archivebox). We did not find one for Wallabag; check its documentation for install options.
Read more
Wallabag
Web application, formerly Poche, allowing you to save articles to read them later with improved readability.
Browse all self-hosted Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) apps.