PeerTube
Decentralized video streaming platform using P2P (BitTorrent) directly in the web browser.
PeerTube vs SRS
Two self-hosted Media Streaming - Video Streaming apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| PeerTube | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Decentralized video streaming platform using P2P (BitTorrent) directly in the web browser. | Simple, high efficiency and real-time video server, supports RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP-FLV and SRT. |
| GitHub stars | 15,395 | 29,440 |
| Forks | – | 5.7k |
| Open issues (incl. PRs) | – | 15 |
| Commits (12 months) | 1.9k | 106 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-09 | 2026-10-31 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 (2026-10-26) | v8.0-d3 (2026-10-31) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language / platform | Nodejs | Docker, C++ |
| Docker Hub image | chocobozzz/peertube | – |
| Docker pulls | 7751.8k | – |
| Est. server size | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU | ~4 GB, 2 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $10/mo | $20/mo |
| Categories | Media Streaming - Video Streaming | Media Streaming - Video Streaming |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- SRS is more popular on GitHub: 29.4k stars vs 15.4k for PeerTube.
- PeerTube had more commits in the last 12 months (1,912 vs 106).
- SRS published a release more recently (v8.0-d3 on 2026-10-31; PeerTube's latest is v8.3.2 on 2026-10-26).
- PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0, SRS under MIT. SRS's license is permissive; PeerTube's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- PeerTube is written in Nodejs; SRS in C++.
- Deployment options listed upstream: PeerTube: none listed; SRS: Docker.
- Only PeerTube has a Docker Hub image that we detected (chocobozzz/peertube).
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for PeerTube (~2 GB server) than SRS (~4 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: PeerTube leads on commit activity and Docker Hub availability; SRS leads on GitHub popularity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-15. It does not rate features or quality.
Get the Docker images
PeerTube
docker pull chocobozzz/peertubeImage on Docker Hub. Ports, volumes and environment variables differ per app; follow the official docs.
Frequently asked questions
Is PeerTube or SRS more popular?
SRS has more GitHub stars (29,440 vs 15,395 for PeerTube, as of 2026-11-15). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, PeerTube or SRS?
PeerTube had more commits over the last 12 months (1,912 vs 106). The last recorded activity was 2026-11-09 for PeerTube and 2026-10-31 for SRS. Releases in the past year: PeerTube 10+, SRS 10+. Our health labels: PeerTube is “Active”, SRS is “Active”.
What licenses do PeerTube and SRS use?
PeerTube: AGPL-3.0. SRS: MIT. SRS's license is permissive; PeerTube's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run PeerTube and SRS with Docker?
PeerTube has a Docker Hub image (chocobozzz/peertube). We did not find one for SRS, though the upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option.
Read more
SRS
Simple, high efficiency and real-time video server, supports RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP-FLV and SRT.
Browse all self-hosted Media Streaming - Video Streaming apps.