transfer.sh
Easy file sharing from the command line.
transfer.sh vs Zipline
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| transfer.sh | Zipline | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Easy file sharing from the command line. | Lightweight, fast and reliable file sharing server that is commonly used with ShareX, offering a react-based Web UI and fast API. |
| GitHub stars | 15,911 | 3,493 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 20 | 347 |
| Last activity | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-08 |
| Latest release | v1.6.1 (2023-12-04) | v4.8.3 (2026-11-08) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language / platform | Go | Docker, Nodejs |
| Docker Hub image | dutchcoders/transfer.sh | diced/zipline |
| Docker pulls | 9574.3k | 87.2k |
| Est. server size | ~512 MB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $3.5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | File Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload | File Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- transfer.sh is more popular on GitHub: 15.9k stars vs 3.5k for Zipline.
- Zipline had more commits in the last 12 months (347 vs 20).
- Zipline published a release more recently (v4.8.3 on 2026-11-08; transfer.sh's latest is v1.6.1 on 2023-12-04).
- Both are licensed under MIT.
- transfer.sh is written in Go; Zipline in Nodejs.
- Deployment options listed upstream: transfer.sh: none listed; Zipline: Docker.
- Both have a Docker Hub image (dutchcoders/transfer.sh, diced/zipline).
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for transfer.sh (~512 MB server) than Zipline (~1 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: transfer.sh leads on GitHub popularity; Zipline leads on commit activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-15. It does not rate features or quality.
Get the Docker images
transfer.sh
docker pull dutchcoders/transfer.shImage on Docker Hub. Ports, volumes and environment variables differ per app; follow the official docs.
Zipline
docker pull diced/ziplineImage on Docker Hub. Ports, volumes and environment variables differ per app; follow the official docs.
Frequently asked questions
Is transfer.sh or Zipline more popular?
transfer.sh has more GitHub stars (15,911 vs 3,493 for Zipline, as of 2026-11-15). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, transfer.sh or Zipline?
Zipline had more commits over the last 12 months (347 vs 20). The last recorded activity was 2026-10-31 for transfer.sh and 2026-11-08 for Zipline. Releases in the past year: transfer.sh 0, Zipline 10+. Our health labels: transfer.sh is “Active”, Zipline is “Active”.
What licenses do transfer.sh and Zipline use?
Both use MIT.
Can I run transfer.sh and Zipline with Docker?
Yes. transfer.sh publishes dutchcoders/transfer.sh and Zipline publishes diced/zipline on Docker Hub.
Read more
Zipline
Lightweight, fast and reliable file sharing server that is commonly used with ShareX, offering a react-based Web UI and fast API.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload apps.